d58847ae8a
The proposal class used to depend on the sTeX workaddress style, this caused problems, which I have now resolved.
110 lines
3.3 KiB
TeX
110 lines
3.3 KiB
TeX
% The main file for developing the proposal.
|
|
% Variants with different class options are
|
|
% - submit.tex (no draft stuff, no ednotes, no revision information)
|
|
% - public.tex (like submit.tex, but no financials either)
|
|
\providecommand{\classoptions}{,keys} % to be overwritten in variants
|
|
\documentclass[noworkareas,deliverables,gitinfo,report\classoptions]{euproposal}
|
|
\usepackage{nimbusserif}
|
|
\addbibresource{../lib/dummy.bib}
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
\begin{center}\color{red}\huge
|
|
This mock proposal is just an example for \texttt{euproposal.cls} it reflects the ICT
|
|
template of January 2012
|
|
\end{center}
|
|
\begin{proposal}[
|
|
% Site 1
|
|
site=fau,
|
|
fauurl=http://fau.de,
|
|
faustreetaddress={Martenstr. 3},
|
|
fautownzip={91058 Erlangen},
|
|
faucountryshort=D,
|
|
faucountry=Germany,
|
|
fautype=University,
|
|
faulogo=jacobs-logo.png,
|
|
fauacronym=FAU,
|
|
faushortname=FAU Erlangen N\"urnberg,
|
|
fauRM=36,
|
|
% Site 2
|
|
site=efo,
|
|
efoshortname=European Future Office,
|
|
efourl=http://efo.eu,
|
|
efocountryshort=NL,
|
|
efocountry={The Netherlands},
|
|
efotownzip={Utrecht, 3kd89},
|
|
efostreetaddress={Kruislann 777},
|
|
efotype=NGO,
|
|
efoacronym=EFO,
|
|
efoRM=36,
|
|
% Site 3
|
|
site=bar,
|
|
barurl=http://bar.fr,
|
|
barcountryshort=F,
|
|
barcountry={France},
|
|
barstreetaddress={Rue de Montparnasse}
|
|
bartownzip={Paris},
|
|
bartype=University,
|
|
baracronym=BAR,
|
|
barshortname=Universit\'e de BAR,
|
|
barRM=36,
|
|
% Site 4
|
|
site=baz,
|
|
bazurl=http://baz.co.uk,
|
|
bazcountryshort=UK,
|
|
bazcountry=United Kingdom,
|
|
bazstreetaddress={4711 Silicon Glen Drive},
|
|
baztownzip={Westerfield U3F2B},
|
|
baztype=SME,
|
|
bazshortname=BAZ International,
|
|
bazacronym=BAZ,
|
|
bazRM=36,
|
|
% Proposal metadata
|
|
acronym={iPoWr},
|
|
acrolong={\underline{I}ntelligent} {\underline{P}r\underline{o}sal} {\underline{Wr}iting},
|
|
title=\pn: \protect\pnlong,
|
|
callname = ICT Call 1,
|
|
callid = FP7-???-200?-?,
|
|
instrument= Small or Medium-Scale Focused Research Project (STREP),
|
|
challengeid = 4,
|
|
challenge = ICT for EU Proposals,
|
|
objectiveid={ICT-2012.4.4},
|
|
objective = Technology-enhanced Documents,
|
|
outcomeid = b1,
|
|
outcome = {More time for Research, not Proposal writing},
|
|
months=24,
|
|
% Coordinator
|
|
coordinator=Prof. Dr. Michael Kohlhase,
|
|
Cemail=michael.kohlhase@fau.de,
|
|
Ctelfax=(49) 9131-85-64052/55,
|
|
compactht]
|
|
\begin{abstract}
|
|
Writing grant proposals is a collaborative effort that requires the integration of
|
|
contributions from many individuals. The use of an ASCII-based format like {\LaTeX}
|
|
allows to coordinate the process via a source code control system like
|
|
{\textsc{Subversion}}, allowing the proposal writing team to concentrate on the contents
|
|
rather than the mechanics of wrangling with text fragments and revisions.
|
|
\end{abstract}
|
|
|
|
\tableofcontents
|
|
|
|
\begin{todo}{from the proposal template}
|
|
Recommended length for the whole part B: 50--60 pages (including tables, references,
|
|
etc.)
|
|
\end{todo}
|
|
\include{quality}\newpage
|
|
\include{implementation}\newpage
|
|
\include{impact}\newpage
|
|
\end{proposal}
|
|
\include{members}
|
|
\include{issues}
|
|
\end{document}
|
|
|
|
%%% Local Variables:
|
|
%%% mode: LaTeX
|
|
%%% TeX-master: t
|
|
%%% End:
|
|
|
|
% LocalWords: efo efoRM baz bazRM miko acrolong ntelligent iting pn pnlong
|
|
% LocalWords: textsc newpage compactht texttt euproposal.cls callname callid
|
|
% LocalWords: challengeid objectiveid outcomeid tableofcontents
|