LaTeX-proposal/examples/eu/strep/propB.tex
Michael Kohlhase d58847ae8a
No workaddress (#50)
The proposal class used to depend on the sTeX workaddress style, this caused problems, which I have now resolved.
2020-08-24 10:51:49 +02:00

110 lines
3.3 KiB
TeX

% The main file for developing the proposal.
% Variants with different class options are
% - submit.tex (no draft stuff, no ednotes, no revision information)
% - public.tex (like submit.tex, but no financials either)
\providecommand{\classoptions}{,keys} % to be overwritten in variants
\documentclass[noworkareas,deliverables,gitinfo,report\classoptions]{euproposal}
\usepackage{nimbusserif}
\addbibresource{../lib/dummy.bib}
\begin{document}
\begin{center}\color{red}\huge
This mock proposal is just an example for \texttt{euproposal.cls} it reflects the ICT
template of January 2012
\end{center}
\begin{proposal}[
% Site 1
site=fau,
fauurl=http://fau.de,
faustreetaddress={Martenstr. 3},
fautownzip={91058 Erlangen},
faucountryshort=D,
faucountry=Germany,
fautype=University,
faulogo=jacobs-logo.png,
fauacronym=FAU,
faushortname=FAU Erlangen N\"urnberg,
fauRM=36,
% Site 2
site=efo,
efoshortname=European Future Office,
efourl=http://efo.eu,
efocountryshort=NL,
efocountry={The Netherlands},
efotownzip={Utrecht, 3kd89},
efostreetaddress={Kruislann 777},
efotype=NGO,
efoacronym=EFO,
efoRM=36,
% Site 3
site=bar,
barurl=http://bar.fr,
barcountryshort=F,
barcountry={France},
barstreetaddress={Rue de Montparnasse}
bartownzip={Paris},
bartype=University,
baracronym=BAR,
barshortname=Universit\'e de BAR,
barRM=36,
% Site 4
site=baz,
bazurl=http://baz.co.uk,
bazcountryshort=UK,
bazcountry=United Kingdom,
bazstreetaddress={4711 Silicon Glen Drive},
baztownzip={Westerfield U3F2B},
baztype=SME,
bazshortname=BAZ International,
bazacronym=BAZ,
bazRM=36,
% Proposal metadata
acronym={iPoWr},
acrolong={\underline{I}ntelligent} {\underline{P}r\underline{o}sal} {\underline{Wr}iting},
title=\pn: \protect\pnlong,
callname = ICT Call 1,
callid = FP7-???-200?-?,
instrument= Small or Medium-Scale Focused Research Project (STREP),
challengeid = 4,
challenge = ICT for EU Proposals,
objectiveid={ICT-2012.4.4},
objective = Technology-enhanced Documents,
outcomeid = b1,
outcome = {More time for Research, not Proposal writing},
months=24,
% Coordinator
coordinator=Prof. Dr. Michael Kohlhase,
Cemail=michael.kohlhase@fau.de,
Ctelfax=(49) 9131-85-64052/55,
compactht]
\begin{abstract}
Writing grant proposals is a collaborative effort that requires the integration of
contributions from many individuals. The use of an ASCII-based format like {\LaTeX}
allows to coordinate the process via a source code control system like
{\textsc{Subversion}}, allowing the proposal writing team to concentrate on the contents
rather than the mechanics of wrangling with text fragments and revisions.
\end{abstract}
\tableofcontents
\begin{todo}{from the proposal template}
Recommended length for the whole part B: 50--60 pages (including tables, references,
etc.)
\end{todo}
\include{quality}\newpage
\include{implementation}\newpage
\include{impact}\newpage
\end{proposal}
\include{members}
\include{issues}
\end{document}
%%% Local Variables:
%%% mode: LaTeX
%%% TeX-master: t
%%% End:
% LocalWords: efo efoRM baz bazRM miko acrolong ntelligent iting pn pnlong
% LocalWords: textsc newpage compactht texttt euproposal.cls callname callid
% LocalWords: challengeid objectiveid outcomeid tableofcontents