From 5b742cbf7d6d605cfb728b0303ee4cebd7594f24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Simerson Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:35:19 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] dkim: added some missing POD text --- plugins/dkim | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/plugins/dkim b/plugins/dkim index 021d7a5..549dc2c 100644 --- a/plugins/dkim +++ b/plugins/dkim @@ -54,7 +54,9 @@ David Summers - http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/2010/08/msg9417.html Matthew Harrell - http://alecto.bittwiddlers.com/files/qpsmtpd/dkimcheck -I first attempted to fix the dkimcheck plugin, but soon scrapped that effort and wrote this one. +I first attempted to fix the dkimcheck plugin, but soon scrapped that effort and wrote this one. Why? + +=over 4 The nine 'if' brackets with 19 conditionals, and my inability to easily determine which of the 15 possible permutations (5 signature validation results x 3 possible policy results) were covered. @@ -64,6 +66,8 @@ The paradim of a single policy, when DKIM supports 0 or many. Although I may yet The OBF programming style, which is nigh impossible to test. +=back + =cut use strict;