fixing feedback from the CTAN submission
This commit is contained in:
parent
780415524c
commit
4ab5c782e1
@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ PACKAGE = dfg
|
||||
TDSCOLL = proposal
|
||||
DTX.cls.base = dfgproposal
|
||||
TDS.tex = dfgreporting.cls dfgpdata.sty
|
||||
TDS.exdirs = examples/proposal
|
||||
TDS.exdirs = examples/proposal examples/report
|
||||
CTAN = $(TDS.tex)
|
||||
EXDIRS = examples
|
||||
|
||||
|
Binary file not shown.
@ -149,7 +149,7 @@
|
||||
% the title page, and specify their heights; |1.5cm| is often a good value.
|
||||
% \end{compactitem}
|
||||
%
|
||||
% \subsection{Work Packages and Work Areas}\label{sec:wpwa}
|
||||
% \subsection{Work Packages and Work Areas}\label{sec:user:wpwa}
|
||||
%
|
||||
% \DescribeMacro{type} The |type| key specifies the activity type of the work package:
|
||||
% |RTD| = Research and technological development (including any activities to prepare for
|
||||
@ -171,7 +171,14 @@
|
||||
% name/deliverables/verification columns in the milestone table.
|
||||
%
|
||||
% \subsection{Risks}\label{sec:user:risks}
|
||||
% \ednote{MK: document the infrastructure, make examples}
|
||||
% In some EU proposals (e.g. FET), we need to identify risks and contingency and specify
|
||||
% mitigation plans for them. In the |euproposal| we use two environments to mark them up.
|
||||
%
|
||||
% \DescribeMacro{risk}|\begin{risk}{|\meta{title}|}{|\meta{prob}|}{|\meta{grav}|}|\ldots|\end{risk}|
|
||||
% makes a paragraph no a risk \meta{title} with gravity \meta{grav} and probability
|
||||
% \meta{prob}, where the body of the environment contains a description of the risk. The
|
||||
% \DescribeMacro{riskcont}|riskcont| is a variant, where \meta{title} names a risk and the
|
||||
% body is a description of the contingency plan.
|
||||
%
|
||||
% \begin{newpart}{MK@MK: This is new, and only partially implemented}
|
||||
% \subsection{Reporting Infrastructure}\label{sec:user:report}
|
||||
@ -427,7 +434,7 @@
|
||||
% \end{macrocode}
|
||||
% \end{environment}
|
||||
%
|
||||
% \subsection{Work Packages, Work Areas, and Deliverables}\label{sec:wpwa}
|
||||
% \subsection{Work Packages, Work Areas, and Deliverables}\label{sec::impl:wpwa}
|
||||
%
|
||||
% \begin{environment}{wp*}
|
||||
% \begin{macrocode}
|
||||
@ -555,17 +562,6 @@
|
||||
% \end{macrocode}
|
||||
% \end{environment}
|
||||
%
|
||||
% \subsection{Risks}\label{sec:impl:risks}
|
||||
%
|
||||
% In some EU proposals (e.g. FET), we need to identify risks and contingency and specify
|
||||
% mitigation plans for them. In the |euproposal| we use two environments to mark them up.
|
||||
%
|
||||
% \DescribeMacro{risk}|\begin{risk}{|\meta{title}|}{|\meta{prob}|}{|\meta{grav}|}|\ldots|\end{risk}|
|
||||
% makes a paragraph no a risk \meta{title} with gravity \meta{grav} and probability
|
||||
% \meta{prob}, where the body of the environment contains a description of the risk. The
|
||||
% \DescribeMacro{riskcont}|riskcont| is a variant, where \meta{title} names a risk and the
|
||||
% body is a description of the contingency plan.
|
||||
%
|
||||
% \subsection{Relevant Papers}\label{sec:impl:papers}
|
||||
%
|
||||
% \begin{macro}{\keypubs}
|
||||
|
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user