60 lines
2.8 KiB
TeX
60 lines
2.8 KiB
TeX
|
\svnInfo $Id: methodology.tex 22870 2012-01-02 11:01:58Z kohlhase $
|
|||
|
|
\svnKeyword $HeadURL: https://svn.kwarc.info/repos/kwarc/doc/macros/forCTAN/proposal/eu/examples/fetopenstrep/methodology.tex $
|
|||
|
|
\section[S/T Methodology]{S/T Methodology\footnote{Note that, whereas the scientific and technological methodology is evaluated
|
|||
|
|
under the criteria ‘S/T quality’, the quality of the
|
|||
|
|
actual workplan is evaluated under FET-Open under the criteria ‘Implementation’.}}\label{sec:methodology}
|
|||
|
|
\begin{todo}{from the proposal template}
|
|||
|
|
Provide a detailed description of the scientific and technological approach or methodology
|
|||
|
|
by which you will attempt to reach your objectives. Demonstrate that you are aware of the
|
|||
|
|
level and nature of the risks of failure, and that you have a good idea on how to address
|
|||
|
|
these risks. Describe a progression of crucial milestones and decision points for your
|
|||
|
|
project, and their expected timing. What would constitute success? What would you learn
|
|||
|
|
from an eventual failure? Where relevant, show how your approach takes into account the
|
|||
|
|
difficulties inherent to the multi-disciplinary nature of the idea or approach that you
|
|||
|
|
are proposing.
|
|||
|
|
A detailed work plan should be presented, broken down into work
|
|||
|
|
packages\footnote{A work package is a major sub-division of the proposed project with a
|
|||
|
|
verifiable end-point – normally a deliverable or an important milestone in the overall
|
|||
|
|
project.} (WPs) which should follow the logical phases of the implementation of the
|
|||
|
|
project, and include consortium management and assessment of progress and results. (Note
|
|||
|
|
that your overall approach to management will be described later, in Section 2).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Notes: The number of work packages used must be appropriate to the complexity of the work
|
|||
|
|
and the overall value of the proposed project. The planning should be sufficiently
|
|||
|
|
detailed to justify the proposed effort and allow progress monitoring by the Commission.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
\end{todo}
|
|||
|
|
\newpage\input{workplan}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
\newpage
|
|||
|
|
\subsection{Work Package List}\label{sec:wplist}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
\begin{todo}{from the proposal template}
|
|||
|
|
Please indicate one activity per work package:
|
|||
|
|
RTD = Research and technological development; DEM = Demonstration; MGT = Management of the consortium
|
|||
|
|
\end{todo}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
%\makeatletter\wp@total@RM{management}\makeatother
|
|||
|
|
\wpfig[pages,type]
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
\newpage\input{../strep/deliverables}
|
|||
|
|
\newpage\input{../strep/milestones}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
\subsection{Work Package Descriptions}\label{sec:workpackages}
|
|||
|
|
\begin{workplan}
|
|||
|
|
\input{../strep/wp-management}\newpage
|
|||
|
|
\input{../strep/wp-dissem}\newpage
|
|||
|
|
\input{../strep/wp-class}\newpage
|
|||
|
|
\input{../strep/wp-temple}\newpage
|
|||
|
|
\end{workplan}
|
|||
|
|
\newpage\input{../strep/risks}
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
%%% Local Variables:
|
|||
|
|
%%% mode: latex
|
|||
|
|
%%% TeX-master: "propB"
|
|||
|
|
%%% End:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
% LocalWords: workplan newpage wplist makeatletter makeatother wpfig
|
|||
|
|
% LocalWords: workpackages wp-dissem wp-class wp-temple
|